I have found the descriptions provided in these things, which i never question. what I question is: what is taken into account a proper name here, as the exact same databases list many other designations for the same item Other than that, or for SIPA, never record the original.
ok, many thanks for your clarifications. I see the logic in keeping the alias. I'm endeavoring to work to Enhance the protection of this and adjacent subject areas around at English Wikipedia. I believe that needs to be dealt with right before sorting matters out below.
I am new to Wikidata particular methods, sorry if I screw anything up or questioned in the incorrect position. I do not Consider HDS really should demand a GND ID, looking at there are plenty of matters with the HDS write-up that do not have a GND ID.
I'm Portuguese, and very informed about that documentation, continually dealing with it for almost 20 years. Thinks like "creating in Avenue x" are mere descriptions for outcomes of listing in the heritage, rather than official names of nearly anything. They are simply a way that enables some identification (normally not even that specific) of the listing. they're not intended to be used as official names, nor ought to be applied as a result.
In sure scenarios, this name by the DGPC groups a number of objects into one devoid of it getting doable to distinguish each independently. Furthermore, I believe even from the page titles for Wikipedia, the frequent and common title should really acquire priority, with reserved Place for other names (Wikidata as an example) or redirects
you've not clearly demonstrated why lexemes are certainly not suitable or sufficient even though. It is possible to backlink to various lexemes. It is achievable to use qualifiers including item sort (P5548) if It really is really needed.
many thanks for mentioning that we missed this dilemma. I just answered it (late). The explanation why we wish to transform this property datatype from Lexeme to merchandise is as a way to facilitate personal pronoun sets that use pronouns from diverse lexemes.
Como referiste e bem há erros graves de nomes na SIPA e até na DGPM, pelo que não são fontes totalmente confiáveis especialmente em matéria de nomes, caso que me parece grave e que está a gerar conflito é o do Bairro das Estacas ou Bairro de habitações económicas de São João de Deus e não de São José situação que eu corrigi e que foi revertida sem qualquer justificação pelo utilizador @Tm. Fontes que suportam essa denominação. DiogoBaptista (discuss) 16:18, thirteen July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
very similar to IRC You may use Slack commands while in the structure /command in which you begin with a ahead slash and afterwards style the supplied command to carry out an motion. as an example, /away to toggle standing, /me to describe a little something you’re performing, or /prefs to open up Tastes menu. additional instructions.
@Clements.UWLib: I am sorry but I still You should not comprehend. Could you stage to 1 product in which There exists dilemma with the current model? « It would get more info not be a great deal work » you seem in excess of-optismistic, creating a assets is not less than a month, deleting a home normally takes years (and each of the mess between of having two competing Attributes), additionally you'll need to generate A huge number of objects (for what: just to copy facts we already have on Lexemes?
for the Wikidata Group, I want to talk to about support:Label and what is the good observe in this example. some Wikidata goods, In cases like this buildings, are labeled merely as their street address by using a prefix.
@Piecesofuk, I am undecided I comprehend the logic below. can be a historic time period the same as the discipline learning that historical period of time? is not that like declaring that "gender scientific studies" should be an alias of "gender"?
In this way we are able to greater document any controversy, weak/strong sourcing issues, or disputes, not simply a few date of delivery but about any germane actuality for a Wikidata item. It's a shame that enwiki nevertheless will not want to Enjoy good and draw from Wikidata's developing pool of structured data for example this, as it's way easier to doc and track this sort of disputes below in a single centralised place, than in parallel, on dozens or numerous language-certain wikis, with mazes of twisty minor insurance policies and rules, all different. Elizium23 (converse) 18:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(3) Technically I do not believe the datatype is often just "replaced" - a fresh assets would want being developed for The brand new datatype, and facts migrated etc. As User:VIGNERON notes This might be sizeable work fixing the ~6000 statements.